Here is another challenge to journalists regarding 911. We know that 1120 families buried empty coffins. At the same time we know there are approximately 9000 human remains on 'frozen for future analysis.' The question is, why are current DNA techniques inadequate to identify who these remains belonged to? And why has no one in the media asked this question? The issue is discussed here: http://smu.gs/L8pTCz
You will have 2 excuse my ignorance if I have misunderstood this, I'm just becoming familiar with Jennings testimony after watching the most recent Loose Change. If what you are saying is that the explosions Barry heard was a controlled demolition that caused WTC7 to collapse then why the delay between them & the collapse? Anyone knows that after the explosives are detonated the building being demolished collapses almost immediately. Yet Barry himself says he remained in the building for a period after he heard the explosions. Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time?
Many CD's have bombs going off before the actual collapse occurs. It is a step by step process, slowly weaken parts until a threshold is met, then the final columns are removed. There is also the possible misfires, and I also believe others techniques, ie explosive-less verinage were incorporated. Either way, whatever was used, structural failure cannot explain any of the towers free fall, symmetric global collapse.
the explosion he heard before the building fell,was the foundation being blown up so when the other bombs explode the building will be sure to fall straight down
"Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time"
Not all CD's have synchronized explosions, some with large time spans. While it isnt clear what was used, each explosion could be 'setting up' by removing certain columns floor trusses etc. The building slowly gets weaker, once the set up is done, the final detonation sends the buildings down.
Both Peter Jennings and Dan Rather made comments on 09/11/01, after seeing the collapse of WTC7. The comments were along the lines of "This looks like the kind of controlled demolitions that we've all seen before, where they use dynamite to take down a building intentionally.". NIST never tested for explosives. Why wouldn't they, if for no other reason than to rule it out?
Take a look at the Danny Jowenko interviews on YouTube! Sadly this man too, died in suspicious circumstances! The truth is out there people..........somewhere. RIP to all the victims.
Barry Jennings + Hess Bombs In WTC 7, Explosions + family called about his DEATH!!!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3cK-VslfXM
Here is another challenge to journalists regarding 911. We know that 1120 families buried empty coffins. At the same time we know there are approximately 9000 human remains on 'frozen for future analysis.' The question is, why are current DNA techniques inadequate to identify who these remains belonged to? And why has no one in the media asked this question? The issue is discussed here:
ReplyDeletehttp://smu.gs/L8pTCz
Any news in Deceber 2013?
ReplyDeleteYou will have 2 excuse my ignorance if I have misunderstood this, I'm just becoming familiar with Jennings testimony after watching the most recent Loose Change. If what you are saying is that the explosions Barry heard was a controlled demolition that caused WTC7 to collapse then why the delay between them & the collapse? Anyone knows that after the explosives are detonated the building being demolished collapses almost immediately. Yet Barry himself says he remained in the building for a period after he heard the explosions. Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time?
ReplyDeleteMany CD's have bombs going off before the actual collapse occurs. It is a step by step process, slowly weaken parts until a threshold is met, then the final columns are removed. There is also the possible misfires, and I also believe others techniques, ie explosive-less verinage were incorporated. Either way, whatever was used, structural failure cannot explain any of the towers free fall, symmetric global collapse.
Deletethe explosion he heard before the building fell,was the foundation being blown up so when the other bombs explode the building will be sure to fall straight down
DeleteYour blip video was removed (top of page video). Contact me for free hosting space on my server (michaelfleming@live.com). Thanks for spreading truth.
ReplyDelete"Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time"
ReplyDeleteNot all CD's have synchronized explosions, some with large time spans. While it isnt clear what was used, each explosion could be 'setting up' by removing certain columns floor trusses etc. The building slowly gets weaker, once the set up is done, the final detonation sends the buildings down.
Both Peter Jennings and Dan Rather made comments on 09/11/01, after seeing the collapse of WTC7. The comments were along the lines of "This looks like the kind of controlled demolitions that we've all seen before, where they use dynamite to take down a building intentionally.". NIST never tested for explosives. Why wouldn't they, if for no other reason than to rule it out?
ReplyDeleteTake a look at the Danny Jowenko interviews on YouTube! Sadly this man too, died in suspicious circumstances! The truth is out there people..........somewhere. RIP to all the victims.
ReplyDeletewhat did sherrie find
ReplyDeleteThank you.....!
ReplyDeleteLatest Job Updates