Monday, September 17, 2012

7 comments:

  1. Barry Jennings + Hess Bombs In WTC 7, Explosions + family called about his DEATH!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3cK-VslfXM

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here is another challenge to journalists regarding 911. We know that 1120 families buried empty coffins. At the same time we know there are approximately 9000 human remains on 'frozen for future analysis.' The question is, why are current DNA techniques inadequate to identify who these remains belonged to? And why has no one in the media asked this question? The issue is discussed here:
    http://smu.gs/L8pTCz

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any news in Deceber 2013?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You will have 2 excuse my ignorance if I have misunderstood this, I'm just becoming familiar with Jennings testimony after watching the most recent Loose Change. If what you are saying is that the explosions Barry heard was a controlled demolition that caused WTC7 to collapse then why the delay between them & the collapse? Anyone knows that after the explosives are detonated the building being demolished collapses almost immediately. Yet Barry himself says he remained in the building for a period after he heard the explosions. Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your blip video was removed (top of page video). Contact me for free hosting space on my server (michaelfleming@live.com). Thanks for spreading truth.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Is there any precedent for a building being detonated, yet the collapse being delayed by such a length of time"

    Not all CD's have synchronized explosions, some with large time spans. While it isnt clear what was used, each explosion could be 'setting up' by removing certain columns floor trusses etc. The building slowly gets weaker, once the set up is done, the final detonation sends the buildings down.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Both Peter Jennings and Dan Rather made comments on 09/11/01, after seeing the collapse of WTC7. The comments were along the lines of "This looks like the kind of controlled demolitions that we've all seen before, where they use dynamite to take down a building intentionally.". NIST never tested for explosives. Why wouldn't they, if for no other reason than to rule it out?

    ReplyDelete